Press release on the worldwide WFME and (IMEAc)
Conference on
"Health for All – through quality medical
education",
Bangkok, Thailand, 25-28.05.2025
The conference of the World Federation of Medical
Education (WFME) and the Institute of Accreditation of Medical Education
(IMEAc) on the theme "Health for all through quality Medical
Education" was held at the Centara Grand & Bangkok Convention Centre
at Central World Hotel. The event brought together world leaders in the field
of medical education, including educators, regulators and government
representatives, with a special focus on patient opinions and intersectoral
collaboration.
The conference was attended by over 1,200 people from all over the world.
In addition to representatives of the WFME and Imac, international
organizations, scientific and medical institutions, universities in the field
of medicine and healthcare, various stakeholders in the field of medical
education participated in the conference, such as:
• evaluators;
• developers of educational programs;
• Accreditation agencies;
• Teachers (all levels);
• patients;
• Students and interns;
• Other people interested in medical education.
The conference was sponsored by many well-known international
organizations that presented exhibition stands. For example, the diamond
sponsors of the conference were: ACGME Global Services and ACGME International,
the Saudi Commission for Medical Specialties (SCFHS) with an exhibition on:
"Support for globally competitive healthcare professionals", the
leading INTEALH Pathology Laboratory with an exhibition: "Advancing the
global healthcare workforce." McGraw Hill was the gold sponsor of the
conference with the exhibition:
"Support for continuing education". The conference was also
sponsored by the National Council of Medical Experts (NBME), Riphah
International University with the exhibition "An excellent Institution
dedicated to Excellence in Education and Research", the International
Congress of Academic Medicine (ICAM), the Royal College of Physicians and
Surgeons of Canada, the Royal College of Canada, the International Association
of Teachers of Medical Sciences, the Medical College of the Korean University
with the exhibition "Medical Education, artificial Intelligence,
competence", AMBOSS with the exhibition "Resources for Teaching, the
study and practice of medicine", Guberner Plastinate GmbH with the
exhibition "Real Anatomy for Learning", with the exhibition "An
intelligent learning tool for mastering concepts in medicine".
The conditions for the conference were exceptionally good.
The hall is spacious, you can walk behind the backs of those sitting, sit in
empty seats or leave. The acoustics are excellent, the sound is clear, without
distortion, there is no echo, and the audibility is good. 3 huge screens for
presentations and videos. 6 microphones that can be easily accessed from
anywhere in the room. There's writing paper, pencil, water, and candy in every
place. The conference was opened on 05/25/2025. On 26-27 .05.2025 there were 4
sessions, on 28.05.2025 there were 2 sessions. There were several speakers at
each session, and after the presentation they stayed on stage and could then be
asked questions. The sessions were sometimes delayed due to the abundance of
questions. After 2 sessions, we went for lunch, and after the other sessions,
we had a coffee break.
The conference focused on the most important topic: achieving health for
all through high-quality medical education. The conference organizers believe
that providing healthcare professionals with the most effective knowledge and
skills makes it possible to provide exceptional patient care and promote a
healthier future for all population groups.
The conference focused on the most important topic: achieving health for
all through high-quality medical education. The conference organizers believe
that providing healthcare professionals with the most effective knowledge and
skills makes it possible to provide exceptional patient care and promote a
healthier future for all population groups.
Key topics of the conference:
What will medical education look like in the future: who should be at the
negotiating table? What will be the evolving landscape of medical
education? It will highlight the importance of engaging diverse
stakeholders, such as patients, communities, students, governments, healthcare
institutions, and educators, to shape the future of our field.
Maximize the health impact of health education: We will explore in detail
how health education can be aligned with critical global initiatives such as
the IHI Quintuple Aim, the WHO Workforce 2030 strategy, and the 3P Safety and
AAAQ approach, ensuring that health professionals are ready to meet the needs
of all segments of the population.
Does accreditation of medical education matter? Howcanwe collaborate with
the medical education accreditation research community to study the impact and
effectiveness of accreditation in improving the quality of medical education?
The organizers of the conference called on the participants to take the
following actions:
Engage with a diverse community of medical education leaders, innovators,
enthusiasts, and reformers.
• Explore the cutting-edge trends and best practices shaping the future of
medical education.
• Get valuable information from internationally renowned experts through
presentations, seminars and symposiums.
• Initiate inspiring discussions on the most important topics affecting
global medical education.
• Build strong connections with colleagues who share your passion for
advancing healthcare through quality education.
As event sponsors, ACGME-I and its partner ACGME Global
Services engaged visitors to their booth through conversations, interactive
modules, and a special video dedicated to all ACGME-I accredited sponsoring
organizations.
Dr. James Arrigi, President and CEO of ACGME-I, and Dr. Lorraine Lewis,
Executive Director, held special sessions at the booth where they talked about
ACGME-I accreditation, and Dr. Halah Ibrahim, Vice President of International
Relations, held a special session on medical education research.
Dr. James Arrigi, President and CEO of ACGME-I, and Dr. Lorraine Lewis,
Executive Director, held special sessions at the booth where they talked about
ACGME-I accreditation, and Dr. Halah Ibrahim, Vice President of International
Relations, held a special session on medical education research.
One of the central topics of the conference was "The
impact of artificial intelligence on medical education: - Educational
innovations and ethical challenges. Dr. Peter J. M. de Jager from the Leiden
University Medical Center (the Netherlands) defined in his report
"Artificial intelligence is a technology that allows a computer to perform
"human" functions." Generative artificial intelligence (AI) can
generate new content: text, images, videos, sounds, codes, 3D design. and
others . The question is how to make the best use of this in education. Job
evaluation should be done by humans, not AI.
It is necessary to train students in the proper use of AI and to train
teachers to understand the possibilities and limitations of AI. Prohibit the
writing of essays and other written works instead of students. Do not enter
confidential data into and.
It is necessary to train students in the proper use of AI and to train
teachers to understand the possibilities and limitations of AI. Prohibit the
writing of essays and other written works instead of students. Do not enter confidential data into and.
Dr. Parra Acosta's
report provided data on the use of AI in Mexico. 51% of teachers in Mexico use
AI in teaching medical students. About the same number use ChatGPT, Copy,
Gemini, Open AI. 94% of teachers recognize the importance for medical
education. 50.9% of teachers use AI to receive automated and periodic feedback
from students. A survey on the role of a teacher in learning with AI showed the
following results: facilitator - 22%, supervisor - 12%, promotion assistance –
15%. Questions remain – how to ensure the personalization of learning with the
help of AI, which subjects to integrate AI into, etc. The insufficient training
of teaching staff for the use of AI, limited cooperation and a small number of
pedagogical innovations in this area were summarized.
Dr. Ramon Espero's
report on Hernandez talked about the introduction of medical education.
According to him, 91.5% of teaching staff consider it important to introduce AI
into medical education. 82.1% believe that it will provide good feedback to
students.71.6% are confident that they can contribute to student participation
in improving people's health. 35% of students and 32.8% of teaching staff use
AI manuals. 22.9% of curricula have integrated AI into themselves. 34.8% of
teaching staff encourage project-based learning using AI. It was concluded that
we do not yet know how fully and integrated it is into society, and there is
still little evidence of successful use of AI.
A report by Patricia
Tempsky from the University of Sao Paulo raised the topic of how to transform
practitioners into teachers. It was noted that the success of the journey from
the profession of a doctor in the healthcare system to teaching depends on the
quality of education. They should be taught as efficiently as possible.
Universities need a program for the development of teaching staff and it should
reflect the involvement of professional doctors in educational activities. The
community of practitioners can be a catalyst for innovation.
Professor Milton
Martins, Executive Director of the Board of Accreditation of Medical Schools in
Brazil, noted the voluntary nature of accreditation. 90 medical schools were
accredited, of which 75% were accredited. More than 40 scientific papers have
been published on the impact of accreditation on the quality of education and
healthcare in the country. Only 3 publications negatively assessed the impact
of accreditation, all the others positively.
Highlights and Results:
Global Focus: The
Conference emphasized the importance of international dialogue and cooperation
in the development and improvement of medical education. Emphasis on equality
and social responsibility:
The issues of training
the workforce to meet the diverse needs of the population and ensure equal
access to quality education were considered. Burnout and well-being:
The conference
addressed the global issue of burnout among healthcare professionals and
emphasized the need for a supportive learning environment and proactive
approaches to well-being. Accreditation and quality assurance:
There was a
discussion of accreditation standards and best practices in the field of
quality assurance and evaluation. It was recommended to use this experience to
improve the accreditation process.
Dr. James Arrigi, President and CEO
of ACGME-I, and Dr. Lorraine Lewis, Executive Director, held special sessions
at the booth where they talked about ACGME-I accreditation, and Dr. Halah
Ibrahim, Vice President of International Relations, held a special session on
medical education research.
Dr. James Arrigi, President and CEO
of ACGME-I, and Dr. Lorraine Lewis, Executive Director, held special sessions
at the booth where they talked about ACGME-I accreditation, and Dr. Halah
Ibrahim, Vice President of International Relations, held a special session on
medical education research.
One of the central
topics of the conference was "The impact of artificial intelligence on
medical education: - Educational innovations and ethical challenges. Dr. Peter
J. M. de Jager from the Leiden University Medical Center (the Netherlands)
defined in his report "Artificial intelligence is a technology that allows
a computer to perform "human" functions." Generative artificial
intelligence (AI) can generate new content: text, images, videos, sounds,
codes, 3D design. and others . The question is how to make the best use of this
in education. Job evaluation should be done by humans, not AI.
It is necessary to train students
in the proper use of AI and to train teachers to understand the possibilities
and limitations of AI. Prohibit the writing of essays and other written works
instead of students. Do not enter confidential data into and.
It is necessary to train students
in the proper use of AI and to train teachers to understand the possibilities
and limitations of AI. Prohibit the writing of essays and other written works
instead of students. Do not enter confidential data into and.
Dr. Parra Acosta's
report provided data on the use of AI in Mexico. 51% of teachers in Mexico use
AI in teaching medical students. About the same number use ChatGPT, Copy,
Gemini, Open AI. 94% of teachers recognize the importance for medical
education. 50.9% of teachers use AI to receive automated and periodic feedback
from students. A survey on the role of a teacher in learning with AI showed the
following results: facilitator - 22%, supervisor - 12%, promotion assistance –
15%. Questions remain – how to ensure the personalization of learning with the
help of AI, which subjects to integrate AI into, etc. The insufficient training
of teaching staff for the use of AI, limited cooperation and a small number of
pedagogical innovations in this area were summarized.
Dr. Ramon Espero's
report on Hernandez talked about the introduction of medical education.
According to him, 91.5% of teaching staff consider it important to introduce AI
into medical education. 82.1% believe that it will provide good feedback to
students.71.6% are confident that they can contribute to student participation
in improving people's health. 35% of students and 32.8% of teaching staff use
AI manuals. 22.9% of curricula have integrated AI into themselves. 34.8% of
teaching staff encourage project-based learning using AI. It was concluded that
we do not yet know how fully and integrated it is into society, and there is
still little evidence of successful use of AI.
A report by Patricia
Tempsky from the University of Sao Paulo raised the topic of how to transform
practitioners into teachers. It was noted that the success of the journey from
the profession of a doctor in the healthcare system to teaching depends on the
quality of education. They should be taught as efficiently as possible.
Universities need a program for the development of teaching staff and it should
reflect the involvement of professional doctors in educational activities. The
community of practitioners can be a catalyst for innovation.
Professor Milton
Martins, Executive Director of the Board of Accreditation of Medical Schools in
Brazil, noted the voluntary nature of accreditation. 90 medical schools were
accredited, of which 75% were accredited. More than 40 scientific papers have
been published on the impact of accreditation on the quality of education and
healthcare in the country. Only 3 publications negatively assessed the impact
of accreditation, all the others positively.
Highlights and Results:
Global Focus: The
Conference emphasized the importance of international dialogue and cooperation
in the development and improvement of medical education. Emphasis on equality
and social responsibility:
The issues of training
the workforce to meet the diverse needs of the population and ensure equal
access to quality education were considered. Burnout and well-being:
The conference
addressed the global issue of burnout among healthcare professionals and
emphasized the need for a supportive learning environment and proactive
approaches to well-being. Accreditation and quality assurance:
There was a
discussion of accreditation standards and best practices in the field of
quality assurance and evaluation. It was recommended to use this experience to
improve the accreditation process.
Dr. James Arrigi, President and CEO
of ACGME-I, and Dr. Lorraine Lewis, Executive Director, held special sessions
at the booth where they talked about ACGME-I accreditation, and Dr. Halah
Ibrahim, Vice President of International Relations, held a special session on
medical education research.
Dr. James Arrigi, President and CEO
of ACGME-I, and Dr. Lorraine Lewis, Executive Director, held special sessions
at the booth where they talked about ACGME-I accreditation, and Dr. Halah
Ibrahim, Vice President of International Relations, held a special session on
medical education research.
One of the central
topics of the conference was "The impact of artificial intelligence on
medical education: - Educational innovations and ethical challenges. Dr. Peter
J. M. de Jager from the Leiden University Medical Center (the Netherlands)
defined in his report "Artificial intelligence is a technology that allows
a computer to perform "human" functions." Generative artificial
intelligence (AI) can generate new content: text, images, videos, sounds,
codes, 3D design. and others . The question is how to make the best use of this
in education. Job evaluation should be done by humans, not AI.
It is necessary to train students
in the proper use of AI and to train teachers to understand the possibilities
and limitations of AI. Prohibit the writing of essays and other written works
instead of students. Do not enter confidential data into and.
It is necessary to train students
in the proper use of AI and to train teachers to understand the possibilities
and limitations of AI. Prohibit the writing of essays and other written works
instead of students. Do not enter confidential data into and.
Dr. Parra Acosta's
report provided data on the use of AI in Mexico. 51% of teachers in Mexico use
AI in teaching medical students. About the same number use ChatGPT, Copy,
Gemini, Open AI. 94% of teachers recognize the importance for medical
education. 50.9% of teachers use AI to receive automated and periodic feedback
from students. A survey on the role of a teacher in learning with AI showed the
following results: facilitator - 22%, supervisor - 12%, promotion assistance –
15%. Questions remain – how to ensure the personalization of learning with the
help of AI, which subjects to integrate AI into, etc. The insufficient training
of teaching staff for the use of AI, limited cooperation and a small number of
pedagogical innovations in this area were summarized.
Dr. Ramon Espero's
report on Hernandez talked about the introduction of medical education.
According to him, 91.5% of teaching staff consider it important to introduce AI
into medical education. 82.1% believe that it will provide good feedback to
students.71.6% are confident that they can contribute to student participation
in improving people's health. 35% of students and 32.8% of teaching staff use
AI manuals. 22.9% of curricula have integrated AI into themselves. 34.8% of
teaching staff encourage project-based learning using AI. It was concluded that
we do not yet know how fully and integrated it is into society, and there is
still little evidence of successful use of AI.
A report by Patricia
Tempsky from the University of Sao Paulo raised the topic of how to transform
practitioners into teachers. It was noted that the success of the journey from
the profession of a doctor in the healthcare system to teaching depends on the
quality of education. They should be taught as efficiently as possible.
Universities need a program for the development of teaching staff and it should
reflect the involvement of professional doctors in educational activities. The
community of practitioners can be a catalyst for innovation.
Professor Milton
Martins, Executive Director of the Board of Accreditation of Medical Schools in
Brazil, noted the voluntary nature of accreditation. 90 medical schools were
accredited, of which 75% were accredited. More than 40 scientific papers have
been published on the impact of accreditation on the quality of education and
healthcare in the country. Only 3 publications negatively assessed the impact
of accreditation, all the others positively.
Highlights and Results:
Global Focus: The
Conference emphasized the importance of international dialogue and cooperation
in the development and improvement of medical education. Emphasis on equality
and social responsibility:
The issues of training
the workforce to meet the diverse needs of the population and ensure equal
access to quality education were considered. Burnout and well-being:
The conference
addressed the global issue of burnout among healthcare professionals and
emphasized the need for a supportive learning environment and proactive
approaches to well-being. Accreditation and quality assurance:
There was a
discussion of accreditation standards and best practices in the field of
quality assurance and evaluation. It was recommended to use this experience to
improve the accreditation process.